(Note: All colored print is my emphasis)
su-per-sti-tion . . . n. 1. A belief held in spite
of evidence to the contrary. 2. a. A belief,
practice, or rite resulting from ignorance
of the laws of nature or from faith in magic
or chance. b. A fearful or abject state of
mindresulting from such ignorance
or irrationality. . . . ( all definitions)
fear-ful . . .adj. 1. . . .3. Feeling anxious or
apprehensive. . . . 5. Indicating anxiety, fear
ab-ject . . . adj. 1. . . . 2. Of the most
miserable kind; wretched
ir-ra-tion-al . . . adj. 1a. Not endowed with
reason. b. .. . contrary to reason; illogical:
an irrational dislike. . . .
The great Roman orator, statesman, and philosopher Cicero (106-43 BC) is quoted as saying "There is in superstition a senseless fear of God."2. The fear of God is likely the truth about evolutionists/atheists and the reason they so forcefully deny His existence and deceive themselves into being superstitious.
Also, please note that design and chance are not to be mixed. Refer to the synonyms of the word chance.>>>>>>>>>>to the right>>>>>>
Also, Logic has a fundamental law- the law of non-contradiction- that a statement and its denial cannot both be true at the same time.
One biology textbookhas a picture of a large spider and its web. What they say about it illustrates the violation of logic's "law of non-contradiction that I have found in every evolution-promoting-book that I have read--which is many.
This intricate spider web is strong,
lightweight, hard to detect, and
ruthlessly effective at capturing passing
insects. It's a marvel of efficient
design, "but its "designer" is the simple
mindless process of natural selection. 3
Their illogical contradiction works out this way:
To get a design requires a mind
Evolution says design does not require a
mind (see above Spider web example).
They both cannot be true.
Good reasoning, judgment, and the English
dictionary--our standard--says design
must be from a mind. Therefore, evolution
is contrary to reason and illogical, which
makes it irrational--which makes it a
Your misguided evolutionist friends are admitting they see design but insist that nature's critters and humans came into existence by chance (See "Natural Selection">>>)WHAT MIND TOLD THE TRANSFORMATIONS WHAT STEPS TO TAKE? Therefore, they are being illogical and contrary to reason (claiming chance can design), which is irrational,which is being superstitious as per superstition definition 2b above.
In the following quotation, the same (spider) authors admit to seeing design by claiming the forelimbs shown are not "ideal" (see drawing to the right>>) Notice the words (next paragraph) "It is inconceivable that nearly the same bone arrangements could be ideal." This supposedly gives them reason to claim that mindless evolution (chance) must have done it. But that is contrary to reason (illogical)because they are saying the design they see is inferior (inferior to their minds, anyway), which is admitting to seeing design!
Modern organisms are adapted to a wide
variety of habitats and lifestyles. The
forelimbs of birds and mammals, for
example, are variously used for flying,
swimming, running over several types of
terrain, and grasping objects such as
branches and tools. Despite this enormous
diversity of function, the internal
anatomy of all bird and mammal forelimbs
is remarkably similar (Fig. 14--8). It is
inconceivable that nearly the same
bone arrangements could be ideal [to their
minds these are less than perfect
designs] for such different functions, as we
would expect if each animal had been
created separately. Such similarity is exactly
what we would expect, however, if bird and
mammal forelimbs were derived from
a common ancestor. " 4
North Carolina public schools, we citizens will help you by amending this state's constitution and freeing you from your bondage to teaching children to use bad logic, because evolution is bad logic, which is irrational, which is superstition!
1. The American Heritage Dictionary, Second College Edition., 1982.
2. Henry, Lewis C. Ed., Best Quotations for All Occasions. (U.S.A.: Fawcett Premier Books, 1945) 223.
3. Teresa Audesirk and Gerald Audesirk, Biology:Life on Earth, 5th ed. (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc., 1999) 272.
4. Ibid. 264
5. Richard Dawkins, The Blind Watchmaker. (New York: W.W. Norton & Co., A.D.1986) 14.
EVOLUTION IS SUPERSTITION BY IRRATIONALITY
Synonyms: chance, random, casual, haphazard, . . .These adjectives apply to what lacks purposefulness or method. Chance implies total absence of design or predictability:my chance meeting with a friend . . . 1
log-ic . . n. . . .2. a. A system of reasoning . . .c. The formal,guiding principles of a discipline, school, orscience. . . 1
NOTE--Science has a guiding principle that says any claim must be capable of being falsified--proven wrong. So--I say that you can prove me wrong if you can show me any living thing that does not appear to be designed--have purposeful (specified) complexity--when closely inspected. Atheists and humanists, please get yourself to a Bible-believing church!-----Every living thing looks to be designed because it is designed!
De-sign . . .1. To conceive in the mind; invent: . . . 2. To form a plan for: …1
Please note—these and all other
definitions of design require a mind—
(check any dictionary!)
I quote evolution's most noted spokesperson: Who says on page 14 of his book The Blind Watchmaker: "natural selection works by “gradual, cumulative, step-by-steptransformations. . . sufficiently simple to havecome about by chance. . . . " 5
il-log-i-cal . . .adj.1. Contradicting or disregarding the principles of logic. 2. Without logic;senseless. . . 1
con-tra-dic-to-ry . . . logic. Either of two propositions related in such a way that it is impossible for both to be true . . . 1